In Tesla's first Autonomy Day, one analyst from Los Angeles asked Elon Musk how the new Full Self-Driving Computer (FSD) would handle the infamous Los Angeles traffic. Mr. Musk, with his usual Jack Sparrow swagger, told him that he would be happy to consider including a "Los Angeles" mode in his future software update.
Well, it is quite appropriate for someone of Mr. Musk's tall stature to target the Los Angeles freeway system so broadly. We at FF, however, have been focusing for quite some time about something a lot narrower - Interstate 405. Why not? Most Los Angelenos and the few unfortunate San Diegans, like myself, spend a big portion of our lifetimes on the 405. That is a story worth telling.
So, to tell the story, I chose as my stage, “CASE: Driving the Future”, an invitational event in Dublin, Ireland. The audience was notably international with only a couple of people having ever been on the 405. The 405 was my metaphor to explain how FF's feature set is focused on improving the user's experience while inside the vehicle, even when the vehicle is caught in a hopeless traffic jam. I told them that having an office three blocks from the 405 means we are all obsessed with the infamous freeway and it subconsciously affects our feature planning. Only in jest… maybe.
Wouldn't we all love to be cozily nested in the zero-gravity rear seat of the FF 91 while it autonomously navigates bumper to bumper through the 13-mile Long Beach stretch which features five freeway interchanges, one airport exit, a gateway to North America's busiest container port and at least three fender-benders at any given point in time? Add some calming mood lighting, in-seat massage and a live streaming Hans Zimmer concert video to that. Lakewood suddenly transforms into Ojai. Luckily, Waze's screams about pulled over vehicles and objects on the road ahead are only audible to the poor soul sitting in the driver's seat. Ah, autonomy and luxury!!! What a dream?
"What level is it? When will you be at Level 4?", a loud voice from the audience interrupted the dream. Level 4 defined by the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) as "High Driving Automation" where the vehicle essentially drives itself with no human intervention for extended periods of time. The vehicle's operation may be limited to a specific route or geographic area and may only work under certain bright and clear weather conditions. Think of the Waymo Robotaxis in Phoenix which only recently have been able to operate commercially without a safety driver in them.
To achieve Level 4 autonomy today, a vehicle will need to pack on a few hundred thousand dollars of sensors - cameras, radars, LIDARs, etc. - and a computer system in the trunk that generates so much heat that it takes a heavy cooling system to keep it running. Did I mention the several hundred pounds of weight added to the vehicle that will lower the vehicle’s range drastically? Or the hundreds of watts of battery power this setup drains as it runs, also leading to drastic range reduction in an electric vehicle. Not to mention that the vehicle begins to look like an alien spacecraft from a 1960s movie, possibly affecting its aerodynamics too.
SAE Level 4, for the next few years, is for robotaxis. Mostly urban, relatively lower speeds and limited route flexibility.
Most passenger cars today are barely SAE Level 1. SAE Level 1 typically includes Adaptive Cruise Control and Automatic Emergency Braking while some Lane Keeping Features may also be considered Level 1. While many vehicle brands offer these features, they may often be pricey options that most buyers may skip to save costs. Some notable EV brands may not even offer these features to reduce the weight of the vehicle.
SAE Level 2 is usually Adaptive Cruise Control and Lane Center Control which work together to keep the vehicle in its lane and at a safe distance behind other vehicles for extended periods of time. The popular Tesla Autopilot and similar features from other brands are technically SAE Level 2 because the driver is still legally responsible for the safe operation of the vehicle. Vehicles enforce this driver alertness either by requiring the driver to keep their hands on the steering wheel or by monitoring the face of the driver. The human is always in-charge even if the vehicle is temporarily in control.